Anschutz Medical Campus Help With Lodging for Families

(Natural News) A shocking new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that when pregnant women are given covid vaccinations during their first or 2nd trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous abortion rate, killing 4 out of 5 unborn babies.

This stunning finding, explained beneath, is cocky-evident from the data published in a new report entitled, "Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons." Simply as agonizing equally the information is the fact that the study authors apparently sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth about vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.

Originally brought to our attention by a Life Site News article, we checked with our own science contacts to review the data and double check all the math. In doing and then, we were able to confirm two things:

1. Aye, the study shows an 82% charge per unit of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their first or second trimesters.
2. Yes, the study authors either deliberately sought to hide this fact with quack obfuscation (explained below) or they are incompetent and made a glaring mistake that brings into question their credibility.

In other words, this report was almost certainly a camouflage to try to merits vaccinating significant women is perfectly safe. But the study data actually prove quite the oppose.

Here's how:

700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the third trimester

Table 4 from the written report, shown below, reveals that a full of 827 meaning women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their showtime vaccine in their 3rd trimester of pregnancy. This ways 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their first or 2nd trimesters. (Y'all have to read the fine print below the table to see this disclosure.)

Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their outset or second trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred earlier their pregnancies hit the xx-week mark. These are indicated as "spontaneous abortions" in the table.

In simple math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the starting time twenty weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their first or second trimesters calculates to an 82% charge per unit of spontaneous abortions amongst these pregnant women who were vaccinated.

It is important to note that deaths of unborn babies during the third trimester are known equally "stillbirths" and non spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could not have possibly occurred in women vaccinated during their 3rd trimester, by definition.

Thus, the study authors dishonestly used the wrong denominator of 827 in their "spontaneous abortions" calculation, when they should have used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters.

Put another style, it is impossible for a woman who was vaccinated for the first fourth dimension during her 3rd trimester to accept a "spontaneous abortion" in the get-go twenty weeks, since they weren't vaccinated during the beginning 20 weeks (and pregnant women aren't time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn't be included in the denominator used to calculate the spontaneous ballgame rate.

The authors of this study should receive an award in the category of, "How to prevarication with statistics," considering they apparently tried to pull a sleight-of-hand trick to arrive appear that vaccines are condom for pregnant women. In reality, they seem to be killing more than four out of 5 unborn babies in the first 20 weeks of gestation, at least in this data set. (It's a small set of 127 meaning women, so nosotros'd similar to see a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in guild to get a more clear picture.)

Apples and oranges, lemons and limes

A elementary way to explicate this with a metaphor is to imagine a purse of 50 lemons and 50 limes, with a science study asking the question, "What percentage of lemons are xanthous?" The scientists count all the yellow fruit and reach the number 50. They mistakenly divide 50 into 100 because there are 100 total piece of fruit, and so they declare, "50% of lemons are yellow" because it'due south 50/100.

But the other 50 pieces of fruit can't possibly be included because they're limes, not lemons. And so the correct math is 50/fifty, which means 100% of the lemons are yellow. That's the correct respond.

In this science paper, they are using 827 as the denominator, even when 700 out of those 827 women were only vaccinated in the 3rd trimester, which is long past the fourth dimension window during which a "spontaneous abortion" tin occur. And since meaning women aren't time travelers, they tin can't go dorsum in fourth dimension and report a spontaneous abortion from months earlier.

If vaccine scientists either tin't practise this basic math — or are willfully deceiving the world with quack obfuscation of the numbers — then "science" has already failed its core promise: to offering "evidence-based" conclusions to understand the earth effectually us.

Notwithstanding when 4 out of 5 pregnant women lose their babies in the first 20 weeks, these scientists falsely claim the spontaneous abortion rate is only 12.half dozen%. Why? Because they're covering up the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, most likely.

In fact, the key writer of the study, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is too named in numerous other studies that claim to document agin reactions in various vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. It raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro brand the same error in other studies that concluded vaccines posed no significant chance of adverse events? For example, here's some other study he co-authored: "Agin events after Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Agin Consequence Reporting System (VAERS), 2011-2013."

That report concluded, "Review of VAERS reports did not identify any new or unexpected safety concerns later TIV-ID."

But is that determination based on bad math, like the study on covid vaccines given to pregnant women? We telephone call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Perhaps this aforementioned study builder has made the same systematic error (or possibly a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. It wouldn't be the first time ane author was found to accept made systematic mistakes across dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.

And isn't that what the "scientific method" demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Admitting to mistakes in conclusions. This is how science progresses, by pointing out errors and demanding they be addressed and corrected. Nosotros can't just accept bad math and call it "science" when the bad math doesn't check out.

Spike protein injections into pregnant women an "atrocity," warns Dr. Peter McCullough

In the mean time, it's clear that 4 out of v pregnancies are beingness terminated past covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the first 20 weeks (at least, according to the pocket-sized data set nosotros have so far). And that ways the "depopulation" aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly every bit globalists hoped they would.

Recall: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) prove that covid vaccine fasten proteins directly assail reproductive organs such every bit the ovaries. Given that spike proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with human cells, it should exist no surprise whatsoever that they are achieving a high charge per unit of spontaneous abortions in pregnant women.

I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine expert and editor of 2 medical journals. Although he does not characterize this as a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking pregnant women and causing more than 80% of unborn babies to exist aborted. He calls information technology an "atrocity" and says the pushing of these vaccines on significant women is "shameful." You can hear him in his own words in the following interview:

Brighteon.com/fc2aa0fe-eae0-4c32-bc23-47e6b6ab9d97

All this means that live births may plummet by 3.2 one thousand thousand over the next year, in the U.s.a. lonely, if every pregnant woman is vaccinated during the first xx weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies existence murdered in the womb, in this case, is reaching "holocaust" levels, which is why this is being called a medical "atrocity."

The fields of medicine and science have turned confronting humanity. They are now killing babies by the millions and injecting adults with spike protein bioweapons that are causing strokes, centre attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.

The vaccine manufacture is at state of war with the human race. And alive-born babies are their enemy. Joe Biden'south land management czar once characterized human children as an "environmental hazard."

This is a war. A bioweapons attack. And it goes beyond mere "crimes confronting humanity." It is a spiritual betrayal of the entire homo race by the institutions of scientific discipline and medicine, both of which long pretended to be motivated by a desire to assistance humanity, but are at present clearly shown to be working towards humanity's destruction.

Learn more in today'southward mind-opening Situation Update podcast:

Brighteon.com/89677c54-51e3-4139-9af1-093fe160a3a1

Hear a new podcast each weekday at:

https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport

tomlinsoncooll1996.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-01-depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions.html

Share this post